Map of the Surname Frank in United Kingdom and in the World

Surname and Country Exploration

Discovering the way in which the surname Frank has spread in United Kingdom and internationally is an exciting journey through the history of families. Through this analysis, we will be able to delve into the traces left by past generations, observing how they have migrated and settled in different geographies over the centuries. Thus revealing the historical patterns and demographic movements that have shaped the presence of this surname in various regions of the country and throughout the world.

Geographic analysis of the Frank family lineage in different regions of United Kingdom

Mapa Overlay Image

Origin of the Surname Frank

The past of the surname Frank is rooted in ancestral times. Throughout history, this surname has been linked to different lands and traditions of United Kingdom, which has contributed to its spread to different places over the centuries.

In-depth investigation

The methodology used in this study involved the collection of information from various civil registries, censuses and other reliable sources, both historical and contemporary. Subsequently, an exhaustive analysis of the data obtained was carried out with the aim of identifying the regions with the greatest presence of the surname Frank in United Kingdom, as well as pointing out any relevant trend or peculiarity in its geographical distribution.

Results

Geospatial Structure

The cartographic representation gives an overview of the dispersion of the surname Frank in United Kingdom. The areas with greater density are highlighted in distinctive tones, in contrast to the areas with little presence of the surname, which are shown in a contrasting way.

Regions with High Concentration

The areas with the highest concentration of the surname Frank include various regions of United Kingdom. These regions are recognized for their importance both economically and culturally, which has contributed to the surname Frank being common in these places. The influence of the surname in these regions may be linked to various factors such as migratory history, economic development and other sociocultural aspects.

Underrepresented Regions

On the contrary, the territories with the lowest percentage of inhabitants with the surname Frank tend to be those with a more rural environment or a less dense population. It is likely that in these areas the presence of people with this surname is limited by various factors such as lack of immigration, reduced mobility or socioeconomic differences.

Historical Analysis

Since ancient times, the spread of the surname Frank into United Kingdom has been shaped by a series of significant events, such as internal and external displacements, armed conflicts and changes in the political landscape. For example, at different times in history, there is an increase or decrease in the presence of the surname in certain geographical areas. This fluctuation may be linked to particular events such as migrations, wars or government decisions.

Demographic Context

Population Displacement

The movement of people, whether within or outside the country of origin, has had a significant impact on the dispersion of the surname Frank. The arrival of different migratory groups to various areas of United Kingdom has contributed to the more widespread presence of the surname in these regions. Likewise, emigration from United Kingdom to other territories has modified the internal distribution of the surname, generating a broader network of bearers of it.

Urbanization

In the phenomenon of urbanization, a notable concentration of the Frank surname has been observed in urban areas of United Kingdom. The job prospects and academic training in these urban centers have captured the interest of families with the last name Frank, increasing their presence in these metropolitan cities.

Socioeconomic Changes

Transformations in the socioeconomic structure of United Kingdom have had a significant impact on the way the surname Frank is distributed. It is interesting to observe how the growth of certain economic sectors has motivated the movement of people to areas where these sectors have greater relevance, which is clearly reflected in the geographical distribution of the surname.

Distribution of the Surname Frank in the World

Global Expansion of the Surname Frank

The family lineage represented by the surname Frank transcends borders and crosses continents, leaving an indelible mark on the history of humanity. Although originally from United Kingdom, this surname has traveled to the four corners of the planet, adapting and merging with various cultures and traditions.

Main Countries of Presence

The surname Frank has taken root in various corners of the world. Since United Kingdom, people carrying this surname have emigrated, which has contributed to its spread in the aforementioned countries. Migration, whether for economic, political or academic reasons, has been decisive in this process of family dispersal.

  1. Germany Germany
  2. United States United States
  3. Nigeria Nigeria
  4. Tanzania Tanzania
  5. Malawi Malawi
  6. Togo Togo
  7. Austria Austria
  8. Mozambique Mozambique
  9. Ghana Ghana
  10. Canada Canada
  11. South Africa South Africa
  12. Argentina Argentina
  13. Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea
  14. Rwanda Rwanda
  15. Brazil Brazil
  16. Hungary Hungary
  17. England England
  18. Kenya Kenya
  19. Switzerland Switzerland
  20. Sweden Sweden
  21. Israel Israel
  22. Poland Poland
  23. France France
  24. Angola Angola
  25. Australia Australia
  26. Vietnam Vietnam
  27. Czech Republic Czech Republic
  28. Chad Chad
  29. Denmark Denmark
  30. Netherlands Netherlands
  31. Liberia Liberia
  32. Zimbabwe Zimbabwe
  33. Sri Lanka Sri Lanka
  34. India India
  35. Trinidad and Tobago Trinidad and Tobago
  36. Italy Italy
  37. Slovenia Slovenia
  38. Guyana Guyana
  39. Vanuatu Vanuatu
  40. Dominican Republic Dominican Republic
  41. Malaysia Malaysia
  42. New Zealand New Zealand
  43. Ecuador Ecuador
  44. Romania Romania
  45. Botswana Botswana
  46. Micronesia Micronesia
  47. Grenada Grenada
  48. Mexico Mexico
  49. Spain Spain
  50. Ukraine Ukraine
  51. Serbia Serbia
  52. Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
  53. Belgium Belgium
  54. Uzbekistan Uzbekistan
  55. Philippines Philippines
  56. Nicaragua Nicaragua
  57. Democratic Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo
  58. Croatia Croatia
  59. Luxembourg Luxembourg
  60. Norway Norway
  61. Solomon Islands Solomon Islands
  62. Slovakia Slovakia
  63. Morocco Morocco
  64. Singapore Singapore
  65. Paraguay Paraguay
  66. Scotland Scotland
  67. Portugal Portugal
  68. Jamaica Jamaica
  69. Aruba Aruba
  70. Indonesia Indonesia
  71. Uganda Uganda
  72. Ireland Ireland
  73. Wales Wales
  74. Pakistan Pakistan
  75. Venezuela Venezuela
  76. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  77. Panama Panama
  78. Chile Chile
  79. Peru Peru
  80. Finland Finland
  81. China China
  82. Qatar Qatar
  83. Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyzstan
  84. Japan Japan
  85. Russia Russia
  86. Zambia Zambia
  87. Lesotho Lesotho
  88. Greece Greece
  89. Egypt Egypt
  90. Antigua and Barbuda Antigua and Barbuda
  91. Iraq Iraq
  92. Uruguay Uruguay
  93. Sudan Sudan
  94. Cameroon Cameroon
  95. Saint Lucia Saint Lucia
  96. Iran Iran
  97. Hong Kong Hong Kong
  98. Suriname Suriname
  99. Kuwait Kuwait
  100. British Virgin Islands British Virgin Islands
  101. Liechtenstein Liechtenstein
  102. Ethiopia Ethiopia
  103. Malta Malta
  104. Estonia Estonia
  105. Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina
  106. Taiwan Taiwan
  107. U.S. Virgin Islands U.S. Virgin Islands
  108. Kazakhstan Kazakhstan
  109. Thailand Thailand
  110. French Polynesia French Polynesia
  111. Bulgaria Bulgaria
  112. Oman Oman
  113. Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Kitts and Nevis
  114. Guatemala Guatemala
  115. Bermuda Bermuda
  116. American Samoa American Samoa
  117. Montenegro Montenegro
  118. Ivory Coast Ivory Coast
  119. Puerto Rico Puerto Rico
  120. Gabon Gabon
  121. Madagascar Madagascar
  122. Bangladesh Bangladesh
  123. Bahrain Bahrain
  124. Turkey Turkey
  125. South Korea South Korea
  126. Nothern Ireland Nothern Ireland
  127. United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates
  128. Cuba Cuba
  129. Marshall Islands Marshall Islands
  130. Jersey Jersey
  131. Lebanon Lebanon
  132. Colombia Colombia
  133. Costa Rica Costa Rica
  134. Northern Mariana Islands Northern Mariana Islands
  135. Bahamas Bahamas
  136. El Salvador El Salvador
  137. Central African Republic Central African Republic
  138. Afghanistan Afghanistan
  139. Tonga Tonga
  140. Palau Palau
  141. Dominica Dominica
  142. Myanmar Myanmar
  143. Mongolia Mongolia
  144. Algeria Algeria
  145. Samoa Samoa
  146. Benin Benin
  147. Fiji Fiji
  148. Georgia Georgia
  149. Macedonia Macedonia
  150. Barbados Barbados
  151. Andorra Andorra
  152. Anguilla Anguilla
  153. Albania Albania
  154. Armenia Armenia
  155. Latvia Latvia
  156. Honduras Honduras
  157. Haiti Haiti
  158. Burkina Faso Burkina Faso
  159. Iceland Iceland
  160. Kosovo Kosovo
  161. Cambodia Cambodia
  162. Belize Belize
  163. South Sudan South Sudan
  164. Cayman Islands Cayman Islands
  165. Swaziland Swaziland
  166. Nepal Nepal
  167. Republic of the Congo Republic of the Congo
  168. Tunisia Tunisia
  169. Equatorial Guinea Equatorial Guinea
  170. Lithuania Lithuania
  171. Tuvalu Tuvalu
  172. Cape Verde Cape Verde
  173. Moldova Moldova
  174. Cyprus Cyprus
  175. Northern Cyprus Northern Cyprus
  176. Azerbaijan Azerbaijan
  177. Mali Mali
  178. Mauritius Mauritius
  179. Burundi Burundi
  180. Jordan Jordan
  181. Bolivia Bolivia
  182. Namibia Namibia
  183. Sierra Leone Sierra Leone
  184. Niger Niger
  185. Senegal Senegal

Influence of Cultural Diversity

The interaction between different cultures has had a significant impact on the diversification of surnames in the country United Kingdom. Throughout history, various events have led to the arrival of people with varied surnames, thus enriching the cultural composition of the region. These migrations have been driven by the curiosity to explore new lands and learn about different ways of life.

Overall Conclusion

The surname Frank has demonstrated an amazing capacity to adapt and spread in different corners of the planet. Its presence on various continents not only reflects the migratory history of United Kingdom, but also the integration and contribution of those who carry it in different societies around the world. The analysis of its dispersion offers us a valuable narrative about how migratory flows and settlement processes have shaped the identity and presence of this surname on a global scale.

In summary, examining the distribution of the Frank surname in United Kingdom and globally reveals fascinating patterns and provides us with deep insight into the history and demographic evolution of both the country and the global diaspora.